Exact Solutions > Interesting Papers > N.A. Kudryashov. Seven common errors in finding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations > 3. Second error... Seven common errors in finding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations

 (3.1) 
The authors [43] considered the wave transformations in the form
 (3.2) 
and obtained the system of the ordinary differential equations
 (3.3) 
 (3.4) 
Li and Zhang [43] proposed ”a generalized multiple Riccati equation rational expansion method” to construct ”a series of exact complex solutions” for the system of equations (3.3) and (3.4). The authors [43] found ”new complex solutions” of the (2+1)  dimensional Burgers equation and ”brought out rich complex solutions”.
However, integrating Eq.(3.4) with respect to we have
 (3.5) 
where C_{1} is an arbitrary constant. Substituting U into Eq.(3.3) we obtain
 (3.6) 
Integrating Eq.(3.6) with respect to we get the Riccati equation in the form
 (3.7) 
Eq.(3.7) can be reduced to the form
 (3.8) 
where and are the roots of the algebraic equation
 (3.9) 
that take the form
 (3.10) 
Integrating Eq.(3.8) with respect to , we find the general solution of Eq.(3.7) in the form
 (3.11) 
where is an arbitrary constant and is determined by Eq.(3.5).
In the paper [43] the authors found 24 solitary wave solutions of the system (3.3) and (3.4), but we can see, that these solutions are useless for researches.
Example 2b. Reduction of the (3+1)  dimensional Kadomtsev  Petviashvili equation by Zhang [44]
 (3.12) 
This equation was considered by Zhang [44], taking the travelling wave into account: , . After reduction Zhang obtained the nonlinear ordinary differential equation in the form
 (3.13) 
The author [44] applied the Expfunction method and obtained the solitary wave solutions of Eq.(3.13).
However, denoting from Eq. (3.13) we have the nonlinear ordinary differential equation in the form
 (3.14) 
Twice integrating Eq.(3.14) with respect to we have
 (3.15) 
where C_{1} and C_{2} are arbitrary constants. This equation is well known. Using the transformations for U and by formulae
 (3.16) 
we have the first Painlevé equation [4, 7]
 (3.17) 
The solutions of Eq. (3.17) are the Painlevé transcendents.
For the case from Eq.(3.15) we obtain the equation in the form
 (3.18) 
Multiplying Eq.(3.18) on we have
 (3.19) 
where C_{3} is an arbitrary constant.
The general solution of Eq. (3.19) is found via the Weierstrass elliptic function [45, 46]. We can see, that there is no need to look for the exact solutions of Eq. (3.13). This solution is expressed via the general solution of well known Eqs. (3.17) and (3.19).
Example 2c. Reduction of the Ito equation by Khani [47]
(3.20) 
Eq. (3.20) was studied by Khani [47]. The author looked for the solutions of Eq. (3.20) taking the travelling wave into account
(3.21) 
Substituting (3.21) into (3.20) when and we obtain the equation in the form
(3.22) 
Twice integrating Eq. (3.22) with respect to we have
(3.23) 
The author [47] looked for solution of Eq.(3.23) when using the Exp  function method.
In fact, denoting in Eq.(3.23) we get the following equation
(3.24) 
Eq. (3.24) is equivalent to Eq. (3.15). The solutions of this equation are expressed for as the first Painlevé transcendents [4, 7] (see the previous example). For the solutions of Eq. (3.24) can be obtained using the Weierstrass elliptic function. So we need not to search for the solutions of Eq. (3.22) as well.
Example 2d. Reduction of the (3+1)  dimensional Jimbo  Miva equation by Öziş and Aslan [48]
 (3.25) 
Using the travelling wave , Eq. (3.25) can be written as the nonlinear ordinary differential equation
 (3.26) 
The authors [48] applied the Exp  function method to Eq.(3.26) to obtain ”the exact and explicit generalized solitary solutions in more general forms”.
But integrating Eq.(3.26) with respect to we obtain
 (3.27) 
where C_{5} is an arbitrary constant. Denoting we get
 (3.28) 
Multiplying Eq.(3.28) on we have the equation in the form
 (3.29) 
where C_{6} is an arbitrary constant. The general solution can be found using the Weierstrass elliptic function. The solution of Eq.(3.26) is found by the integral
 (3.30) 
We can see that Eq.(3.27) has the general solution (3.30) and all partial cases can be found from the general solution of Eq.(3.30).
Example 2e. Reduction of the Benjamin  Bona  Mahony equation [49]
 (3.31) 
Eq. (3.31) was considered by Ganji and co  authors [49]. In terms of the travelling wave , they obtained the equation
 (3.32) 
Using the Exp  function method the authors [49] looked for the solitary wave solutions of Eq.(3.32).
Integrating Eq. (3.32) with respect to we have
 (3.33) 
Multiplying Eq.(3.33) on and integrating the result with respect to again we obtain the equation
 (3.34) 
The solution of Eq.(3.34) can be given by the Weierstrass elliptic function [4, 7, 45, 46]. We can see that the authors [49] obtained the known solitary wave solutions of Eq.(3.31).
Example 2f. Reduction of the Sharma  Tasso  Olver equation by Erbas and Yusufoglu [50]
 (3.35) 
Taking the travelling wave , the authors [50] obtained the reduction of Eq.(3.35) in the form
 (3.36) 
The authors of [50] used the Exp  function method to find ”new solitonary solutions”, but they left out of their account that using the transformation
 (3.37) 
Eq.(3.36) can be transformed to the linear equation
 (3.38) 
The solution of Eq.(3.38) takes the form
 (3.39) 
Substituting the solution (3.39) into the transformation (3.37) we obtain the solution of Eq.(3.36) in the form
 (3.40) 
Certainly all the solutions obtained by means of the Exp  function method can be found from solution (3.40).
Example 2g. Reduction of the dispersive long wave equations by Abdou [35]
 (3.41) 
Using the wave transformations , , , the system of equations (3.41) can be written in the form
 (3.42) 
 (3.43) 
Abdou [35] looked for solutions of the system of equations (3.42) and (3.43) taking ”the extended tanh method” into account.
Integrating Eqs. (3.42) and (3.43) with respect to we obtain
 (3.44) 
 (3.45) 
Substituting the value of from (3.44) into Eq.(3.45) we have
 (3.46) 
Multiplying Eq.(3.46) on and integrating the equation with respect to , we have the equation in the form
 (3.47) 
The general solution of Eq.(3.47) is determined via the Jacobi elliptic function [7]. The variable is found by the formula (3.44) and there is no need to look for the exact solutions of the Eqs.(3.42) and (3.43).
Unfortunately we have many similar examples. Some of them are also presented in our recent work [46].
The EqWorld website presents extensive information on solutions to various classes of ordinary differential equations, partial differential equations, integral equations, functional equations, and other mathematical equations.
Copyright © 20042017 Andrei D. Polyanin